Cases 31 - 40 of 229
STATE OF TEXAS et al v. United States Department of The Interior et al
as 7:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS, Texas General Land Office, Texas Department of Agriculture and others
Defendant:
United States Department of The Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Debra Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, Alaska Wilderness League, Environment America and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish And Wildlife Service and United States Department of the Interior
Petitioner:
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, North Slope Borough, Kuukpik Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Alaska State Chamber of Commerce, Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
State of Oklahoma, et al v. United States Department of Interior, et al
as 23-6008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF MINES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA A. HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT and others
Western Energy Alliance et al v. United States Department of Interior Secretary et al
as 1:2022cv00252
Respondent:
United States Department of the Interior Secretary, Deb Haaland and United States Bureau of Land Management
Petitioner:
Western Energy Alliance and Petroleum Association of Wyoming
Intervenor:
Center for Biological Diversity, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Western Watersheds Project et al v. Moore et al
as 9:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council and others
Defendant:
Randy Moore, United States Forest Service, Martha Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, et al v. NPS, et al
as 22-5205
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, Wilderness Watch, Environmental Action Committee of West Marin and others
Defendant / Appellant:
National Park Service, United States Department of the Interior, Shawn Benge, in his official capacity and others
Helena Hunters and Anglers Association et al v. Moore et al
as 9:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Helena Hunters and Anglers Association, Western Watersheds Project, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Randy Moore, United States Forest Service, Martha Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
HILL et al v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2022cv01781
Plaintiff:
President MICHAEL HILL, Senator JASON KILLS PRETTY ENEMY, ALEE BIRDHAT and others
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND and BRYAN NEWLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Allegheny Wood Products, Inc. v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 2:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Allegheny Wood Products, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Black Rock City LLC, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Black Rock City LLC and Burning Man Project
Defendant / Appellee:
Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, United States Department of the Interior and Winnemucca District Office for the Bureau of Land Management
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
