Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 113
Cruz et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2018cv06371
Defendant: United Network for Organ Sharing, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and United States Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff: Marilyn Walto, Wilnelia Cruz, Luis Torres and others
Undetermined: State of Kansas
Intervenor Defendant: University of Kansas Hospital Authority
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Irish 4 Reproductive Health et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00491
Defendant: University of Notre Dame, United States Department of the Treasury, United States Department of Labor and others
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 3, Irish 4 Reproductive Health and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Protect Democracy Project, Inc et al v. U.S. Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv10874
Plaintiff: Protect Democracy Project, Inc , BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW , MICHAEL F CROWLEY and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions , III and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Brookhaven Memorial Hospital Medical Center, Inc. et al v. Azar
as 1:2018cv01735
Plaintiff: Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc., South Nassau Communities Hospital, Mercy Medical Center and others
Defendant: Secretary Alex Azar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Brookhaven Memorial Hospital Medical Center, Inc. et al v. Azar
as 2:2018cv01735
Plaintiff: Legacy Waterbury Hospital, Inc., Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc., South Nassau Communities Hospital and others
Defendant: Alex Azar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Alameda Health System, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 18-15441
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO and others
Defendant - Appellant: ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, SEEMA VERMA, Administrator, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine v. U.S. Department of Labor et al
as 1:2018cv01092
Plaintiff: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Defendant: U.S. Department of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 552
Diaz v. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama et al
as 7:2017cv01702
Plaintiff: Richard Diaz
Defendant: Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama and Paul W Bryant, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Regents of University of California et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv05211
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, Former Federal Immigration and Homeland Security Officials and others
Plaintiff: Regents of University of California, Janet Napolitano and UC Regents
Petitioner: City of Seattle, U.S. Conference of Mayors, City of West Hollywood and others
Amicus Curiae: Services, Immigrant Rights, and Education Network, West Contra Costa Unified School District, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State Of New York et al v. Donald Trump et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv05228
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Washington, State of New Mexico and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America, Donald Trump and others
Amicus Curiae: The Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County (LASSMC), Service Employees International Union, African Services Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?