Cases 61 - 70 of 103
Valle de Sol, et al v. Michael Whiting, et al
as 12-17046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
C.M., a minor, COALICION DE DERECHOS HUMANOS, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, EDWARD G. RHEINHEIMER, DAISY FLORES, Gila County, Attorney in her official Capacity and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, JANICE K. BREWER and PHOENIX LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION
Risenhoover v. Clinton et al
as 0:2012cv01202
Plaintiff:
Paul Maas Risenhoover
Defendant:
Hilary Clinton, Tim Kuykendall, Linda Stinnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Whitfield v. City of Ridgeland et al
as 3:2011cv00744
Plaintiff:
Charles Dwight Whitfield
Defendant:
City of Ridgeland, Ridgeland Police Department, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 11-3213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Hispanic Interest Coalition of, et al v. Governor of Alabama, et al
as 11-14535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HISPANIC INTEREST COALITION OF ALABAMA, AIDS ACTION COALITION, HUNTSVILLE INTERNATIONAL HELP CENTER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, ALABAMA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION and others
:
SERVICE
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al
as 11-3114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri and Tim Fitch, in his official capacity as Chief of the St. Louis County, Missouri, Police Department
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al
as 11-3112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, James Corwin, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Kansas City, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant:
Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department, Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri, Steven Kruse, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Bowling Green, Missouri, Police Department and others
Shukry Messih v. Edmund Gerald Brown Jr et al
as 2:2011cv06161
Defendant:
Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr., Kamala D Harris, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Shukry Messih
Washington Trucking Associations et al v. Trause et al
as 2:2011cv01223
Defendant:
Paul Trause , Jane Doe Trause , Bill Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Washington Trucking Associations , Knight Transportation, Inc. , Eagle Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights et al v. Deal et al
as 1:2011cv01804
Plaintiff:
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights , Service Employees International Union , Southern Regional Joint Board of Workers' United and others
Defendant:
Nathan Deal , Samuel S. Olens , Clyde L. Reese, III and others
Amicu:
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE , United Mexican States , Argentina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
