Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Buckley v. Henderson County et al
as 1:2024cv01099
Not Yet Classified: Tasha Carver
Plaintiff: Dameion Buckley
Defendant: Henderson County and Zachary Jeans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Buckley v. Henderson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv01040
Plaintiff: Dameion Buckley
Defendant: Henderson County Sheriff's Department and Zachary Jeans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Walen et al v. Burgum et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff: Charles Walen and Paul Henderson
Defendant: Doug Burgum, Alvin Jaeger and Michael Howe
Intervenor Defendant: Mandan, Hidatsa & Arikara Nation, Lisa DeVille and Cesareo Alvarez, Jr.
Petitioner: North Dakota Legislative Assembly and Terry B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant: VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor: TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
William Carol Clarke vs. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff: William Carol Clarke
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Communications Commission, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maxfield et al v. Cox et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00051
Defendant: Spencer Cox and Deidre Henderson
Plaintiff: Steven G. Maxfield, Lori Newby and Daniel Newby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marchant et al v. De Blasio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv10544
Plaintiff: Garth Marchant, Victoria King, Denek Ham and others
Defendant: Cory Johnson, City of New York, Honorable Bill De Blasio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson et al v. Oregon Department of Human Services We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00724
Plaintiff: Patrick Louis Henderson and Christine Diane Henderson
Defendant: Oregon Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Vanderstrait v. State of Nevada et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02160
Defendant: City of Henderson Nevada, City of Las Vegas Nevada, County of Clark Nevada and others
Plaintiff: Martin Michael Vanderstrait
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?