Cases 1 - 8 of 8
City of Hammond, et al v. Lake County Board of Elections, et al
as 24-1125
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MCDERMOTT, EDUARDO FONTANEZ, LONNIE RANDOLPH and others
Defendant:
LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DIEGO MORALES, Secretary of State, in his official capacity and STATE OF INDIANA
City of Hammond et al v. Lake County Judicial Nominating Commission
as 2:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
City of Hammond, Eduardo Fontanez, Thomas McDermott and others
Defendant:
Lake County Judicial Nominating Commission
Regan et al v. Hammond Indiana City of
as 2:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Christopher Regan and Northwest Indiana Creative Investors Association Inc
Defendant:
Hammond Indiana City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers et al v. O'Keeffe et al
as 3:2015cv00467
Defendant:
Greg Aldrich, Ed Armstrong, Kate Brown and others
Plaintiff:
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Trucking Associations, Inc. and Consumer Energy Alliance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oscar Dantzler v. EEOC, et al
as 12-5060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oscar Dantzler
Defendant - Appellee:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Keith Hills, Agent Does One-Five and others
PIERCE EL-BEY v. CITY OF THOMASVILLE
as 1:2011cv00413
Plaintiff:
TORNELLO FONTAINE PIERCE EL-BEY
Defendant:
CITY OF THOMASVILLE, WAYNE L. MICHAEL, CITY OF THOMASVILLE POLICE DEPT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DANTZLER v. UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION et al
as 1:2009cv02149
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, KEITH HILLS, AGENT DOES ONE-FIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shade v. State of California, et. al.
as 2:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
Ross Shade
Defendant:
State of California, Yolo County Superior Court, Yolo County Superior Court Appellant Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
