Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Metabank v. Conduent Business Services, LLC
as 4:2019cv04138
Plaintiff:
Metabank
Defendant:
Conduent Business Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ohio Valley Bank Company The v. MetaBank
as 2:2019cv00191
Defendant:
MetaBank
Plaintiff:
Ohio Valley Bank Company The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MetaBank v. Pangea Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv04087
Defendant:
Marco Pesquera, Pangea Enterprises, Inc., CC JV LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MetaBank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Metabank v. Seasons Corporate, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv12868
Defendant:
Zvi Bloom and Seasons Corporate, LLC
Plaintiff:
Metabank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
MetaBank v. Pangea Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05462
Defendant:
McDermott International, Inc., Marco Pesquera, Pangea Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MetaBank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SACCHI v. METABANK et al
as 3:2018cv09201
Plaintiff:
JOHN SACCHI
Defendant:
METABANK , META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AFS/IBEX, a division of METABANK v. AEGIS MANAGING AGENCY LIMITED et al
as 2:2018cv00631
Defendant:
TRANSPORTATION UNDERWRITERS, INC., AEGIS SYNDICATE 1225, AEGIS MANAGING AGENCY LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
AFS/IBEX, a division of METABANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Card Limited v. MetaBank
as 2:2016cv00980
Plaintiff:
Card Limited
Defendant:
MetaBank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Endara v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv01032
Plaintiff:
Juan Endara
Defendant:
Automatic Data Processing, Inc., First Data Corporation, Meta Financial Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calvin Smith v. Unirush, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02533
Defendant:
Meta Financial Group, Inc, Metabank, Rush Communications of NYC, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
