Cases 11 - 20 of 22
The Estate of Sidney Scott Kinchen v. MetLife Insurance Company, USA
as 1:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Sidney Scott Kinchen
Defendant:
MetLife Insurance Company, USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnette et al v. Metlife Insurance Company USA
as 2:2015cv02179
Plaintiff:
Randal Barnette and Angela Lauber
Defendant:
Metlife Insurance Company USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Shakirov v. Metlife Insurance Company USA
as 6:2015cv01617
Plaintiff:
Utkirbek Shakirov
Defendant:
Metlife Insurance Company USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Todd v. Metlife Insurance Company USA
as 1:2015cv01323
Defendant:
Metlife Insurance Company USA
Plaintiff:
Russell H. Todd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ridenour v. Metlife Investors USA Insurance Company et al
as 5:2015cv00734
Plaintiff:
Wiley Don Ridenour
Defendant:
Metlife Investors USA Insurance Company and Metlife Insurance Company USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Overstreet v. MetLife Insurance Company USA
as 1:2015cv01170
Plaintiff:
Natalie M Overstreet
Defendant:
MetLife Insurance Company USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hughes, Jr. v. MetLife Insurance Company USA et al
as 1:2015cv00359
Plaintiff:
Billy Hughes, Jr.
Defendant:
MetLife Insurance Company USA and Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Deaton v. Metlife Insurance Company USA
as 4:2015cv00648
Plaintiff:
Betty Deaton
Defendant:
Metlife Insurance Company USA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Gilmore v. METLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY USA et al
as 4:2015cv00614
Plaintiff:
Cecily A Gilmore
Defendant:
METLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY USA and METLIFE INVESTORS USA INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
South State Bank v. Shah et al
as 0:2015cv01051
Plaintiff:
South State Bank
Defendant:
Jugalkishor K Shah, Nasrollah Samiy, Curt Feuer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
