Cases 21 - 30 of 1,197
RRE Services et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
RRE Services and Joshua Edwards
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lawn v. FCA US, LLC
as 3:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Bradford Lawn
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
Andrew Berzanskis, et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 24-1137
Not Yet Classified:
In re: CHRYSLER PACIFICA FIRE RECALL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BERZANSKIS, 22-cv-10508, MARGARET WILENSKY, 22-cv-10508, VERONICA BRYAN, 22-cv-10771 and others
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC and FIAT CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES, FCA US, LLC
EnovaPremier of Warren Michigan, LLC v. FCA US, LLC
as 2:2024cv10398
Plaintiff:
EnovaPremier of Warren Michigan, LLC
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, d/b/a Stellantis North America, f/k/a Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, FCA US, LLC Doing business as Stellantis North America formerly known as Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Mireles v. FCA US LLC
as 4:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Maria Mireles
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ruano et al v. FCA US LLC
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Joe Ruano and Elva Ruano
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson v. FCA US LLC
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Marquez v. FCA US, LLC
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Jorege Marquez
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
Gustavo Diaz, et al v. FCA US LLC
as 24-1197
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVO DIAZ, JOSEPH SANTOS, CHRISTIAN A. GIBSON and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Carrillo v. FCA US, LLC
as 3:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Osmar Piedra Carrillo
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
