Cases 31 - 40 of 42
PLANETSPACE INC. v. USA
as 1:2009cv00476
Plaintiff:
PLANETSPACE INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
ORBIT TELECOM CORP. v. TELMEX USA, LLC
as 2:2009cv01650
Plaintiff:
ORBIT TELECOM CORP.
Defendant:
TELMEX USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PLANETSPACE, INC v. USA
as 1:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
PLANETSPACE, INC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION and SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Naden et al v. Numerex Corp.
as 1:2008cv11195
Plaintiff:
Gary Naden, Gary Naden, David Ronsen and others
Defendant:
Numerex Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pentech Financial Services, Inc. v. Orbital Group, LLC
as 1:2008cv03428
Plaintiff:
Pentech Financial Services, Inc. and Pentech Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Orbital Group, LLC and Andrew Uribe
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Tipton, et al v. Frazier, et al
as 1:2008cv01169
Defendant:
James Frazier, James Frazier, James Frazier and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Tipton, Ryan Tipton, Jearl Tipton and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Macsteel International USA Corp v. M/V Orbit et al
as 4:2008cv02917
Plaintiff:
Macsteel International USA Corp
Defendant:
M/V Orbit and Orbiter Navigation Ltd
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Naden et al v. Numerex Corp.
as 1:2008cv00107
Plaintiff:
Gary Naden, Gary Naden, David Ronsen and others
Defendant:
Numerex Corp.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Macsteel International USA Corp. v. M/V Orbit et al
as 1:2008cv07394
Plaintiff:
Macsteel International USA Corp.
Defendant:
M/V Orbit and Orbiter Navigation Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
