Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Henley v. Dascom Systems Group, LLC
as 1:2013cv00699
Plaintiff:
Robert Henley
Defendant:
Dascom Systems Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Indemnity Insurance Corporation, RRG v. Insurance Systems Group, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03276
Plaintiff:
Indemnity Insurance Corporation, RRG
Defendant:
Insurance Systems Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Campbell et al v. Yu et al
as 1:2012cv03169
Plaintiff:
John C. Campbell, Basil Malouf and Baseem Malouf
Defendant:
Weihe Yu, Junfeng Chen, Nian Chen and others
Nominal Defendant:
New Energy Systems Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ss Diversity - Stockholders Suits
United States Of America v. Learning Systems Group
as 8:2012cv00597
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Learning Systems Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Mike Jordan Company, LLC v. Advanced Systems Group, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00613
Plaintiff:
Mike Jordan Company, LLC
Defendant:
Advanced Systems Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McProud, Inc. v. Armstrong McCall LP
as 8:2011cv01504
Defendant:
Armstrong McCall LP, Beauty Systems Group LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
McProud, Inc.
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2011cv05702
Plaintiff:
Bambeck Systems Group and Peninsula Plywood Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRECOM SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. v. USA
as 1:2011cv00234
Plaintiff:
TRECOM SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
VISTRONIX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
ELG Haniel Metals Corp. v. Wolcott Systems Group, LLC
as 5:2010cv01546
Plaintiff:
ELG Haniel Metals Corp.
Defendant:
Wolcott Systems Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reese v. Sigma Systems Canada, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01326
Plaintiff:
Michelle Reese
Defendant:
Sigma Systems Canada, Inc. and Sigma Systems Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
