Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 163
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv03828
Plaintiff: LANCASTER HOSPITAL CORPORATION doing business as PALMDALE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER also known as LANCASTER HOSPITAL, HRI HOSPITAL, INC. doing business as HRI HOSPITAL also known as HUMAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE, UHS OF ANCHOR, L.P. doing business as SOUTHERN CRESCENT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM also known as ANCHOR HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
UHS-Corona, Inc. et al v. Optum Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv02556
Defendant: DOES 1 through 50, inclusive., Primecare of Riverside, Inc., Primecare of Redlands, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Temecula Valley Hospital, Inc., UHS-Corona, Inc., Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv03506
Plaintiff: THE PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL, HMH HOSPITALS CORPORATION doing business as HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, STRONG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2020cv03485
Plaintiff: WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP HOSPITAL DISTRICT doing business as WASHINGTON HOSPITAL, COUNTY OF KERN doing business as KERN MEDICAL CENTER, DIGNITY HEALTH doing business as ST. MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II, XAVIER BECERRA and NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Enloe Medical Center et al v. Alex M. Azar II
as 2:2020cv09278
Plaintiff: County of Riverside doing business as Riverside University Health Systems-Medical Center also known as Riverside County Regional Medical Center, County of San Bernardino doing business as Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Good Samaritan Hospital, a California Limited Partnership doing business as Good Samaritan Hospital and others
Defendant: Alex M. Azar II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and Alex M. Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Fox Valley Hospitality Inc v. Hotel Connections Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01326
Plaintiff: Fox Valley Hospitality, Inc. d/b/a Doubletree Appleton and Fox Valley Hospitality Inc doing business as Doubletree Appleton
Defendant: Trans State Holdings Inc and Hotel Connections Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EMPIRE HEALTH FOUNDATION et al v. AZAR We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02149
Plaintiff: DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER, EMPIRE HEALTH FOUNDATION and VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Kaweah Delta Health Care District et al v. Alex M. Azar II
as 2:2020cv06564
Plaintiff: Marin General Hospital, Pasadena Hospital Association, LTN doing business as Huntington Hospital also known as Huntington Memorial Hospital, County of Riverside doing business as Riverside University Health Systems - Medical Center also known as Riverside County Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant: Alex M. Azar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01957
Plaintiff: ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER, PROVIDENT HOSPITAL, UPPER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01811
Plaintiff: EMANATE HEALTH FOOTHILL PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL, EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER doing business as EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL doing business as EMANATE HEALTH QUEEN OF THE VALLEY HOSPITAL formerly known as CITRUS VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER doing business as INTER-COMMUNITY CAMPUS AND QUEEN OF and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?