Cases 41 - 50 of 108
Sanders v. Chrysler Group LLC Pension Plan et al
as 2:2013cv11046
Plaintiff:
Delores Buchanan Sanders
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC Pension Plan and Chrysler LLC
Chrysler Group, LLC v. Proactive Training Solution
as 13-1268
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
PROACTIVE TRAINING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Colonnese v. Chrysler Group LLC
as 3:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Patricia Colonnese
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
MILLER et al v. CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC.
as 1:2012cv08980
Plaintiff:
Jay Miller and BROOKE WILLMAN
Defendant:
CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Martin et al v. Chrysler Group, LLC
as 6:2012cv00060
Defendant:
Chrysler Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
David A. Martin and Mark Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Albany Dodge, Inc. et al v. Chrysler Group LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01285
Plaintiff:
Albany Dodge, Inc. , Armory Garage, Inc. , Goldstein Chrysler Jeep, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC and LIA Auto Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chrysler Group, LLC v. Eaton Corporation
as 2:2012cv12896
Plaintiff:
Chrysler Group, LLC
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bergstrom Imports Milwaukee Inc et al v. Chrysler Group LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
Bergstrom Imports Milwaukee Inc and Bergstrom Corporation
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Los Feliz Ford, Inc. v. Chrysler Group, LLC
as 12-56082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOS FELIZ FORD, INC., DBA Star Chrysler Jeep
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC
Kings Dodge, Inc. v. Chrysler Group, LLC
as 1:2012cv00445
Plaintiff:
Kings Dodge, Inc.
Defendant:
Chrysler Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
