Cases 61 - 70 of 90
Kathleen Shinobu Gage v. WJ Bradley Mortgage Capital LLC et al
as 8:2013cv00865
Defendant:
All Other Persons Unknown, Does and WJ Bradley Mortgage Capital LLC
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Shinobu Gage
BOERNER-GAGE v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2013cv02304
Plaintiff:
DOREEN BOERNER-GAGE
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Motes et al v. Gage
as 1:2012cv00237
Plaintiff:
T. Dean Motes , Theresa M. Motes , Michael D. Thraen and others
Defendant:
Jack Robert Gage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Gage Center Dental Group, P.A. et al
as 2:2012cv02387
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gage Center Dental Group, P.A., Gregory K. Johnson, D.D.S., Eric C. Johnson, D.D.S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv04553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Scott v. Gage et al
as 6:2011cv01565
Plaintiff:
Sharon A. Scott
Defendant:
Benjamin Gage , Denise Gage , 39 Commercial Realty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC. v. J-CON, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv04963
Plaintiff:
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
J-CON, INC., CARL GAGE and CONNIE GAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Esurance Insurance Company et al v. Zeller et al
as 2:2011cv02473
Plaintiff:
Esurance Insurance Company
Defendant:
Douglas Zeller, S. W., Elizabeth Zeller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metroplex, Inc. et al v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc.
as 2:2010cv02159
Plaintiff:
Metroplex, Inc. , MP&U Investments, Inc and Thomas W Gage
Defendant:
United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCormick v. Air Gage Company
as 2:2010cv12547
Plaintiff:
Michael C. McCormick
Defendant:
Air Gage Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
