Cases 71 - 80 of 217
Simbulan v. TD Bank, N.A
as 3:2019cv00676
Plaintiff:
Ernie Simbulan
Defendant:
TD Bank US Holding Company and TD Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Western Surety Company v. TURN KEY LUMBER, INC. et al
as 4:2019cv10601
Defendant:
TURN KEY LUMBER, INC., TURNKEY LUMBER, Juliano Fernandes and others
Plaintiff:
Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olaogun v. Bank Of America, NA
as 6:2019cv00339
Plaintiff:
Isaac Olaogun
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Bank of America N.A.
3Rd Party Defendant:
TD Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KAISEN v. TD BANK, N.A.
as 2:2018cv05504
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. KAISEN
Defendant:
TD BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yao v. Carillon Tower/Chicago LP et al
as 1:2018cv07865
Plaintiff:
Annabelle Yao
Defendant:
Tizi LLC d/b/a Local Government Regional Center of Illinois, Forefront EB-5 Fund (ICT) LLC, TD Bank N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lesser et al v. TD Bank, N.A., et al
as 1:2018cv09922
Plaintiff:
Joseph S Lesser, Loeb Partners Realty LLC and Joseph S. Lesser
Defendant:
TD Bank, N.A.,, Capital One, N.A. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
National Consulting and Development, Inc. v. TD Bank, N.A. et al
as 7:2018cv05699
Defendant:
TD Bank, N.A. , Sherrance Henderson and Cornucopia Queen, Inc.
Plaintiff:
National Consulting and Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SCHEFFLER v. TD BANK N.A.
as 1:2018cv06688
Plaintiff:
NICOLE F SCHEFFLER
Defendant:
TD BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO Harris Bank NA v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2018mc01004
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank NA
Garnishee:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and TD Bank, N.A.
Debtor:
Remzi Oncu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESSGEEKAY CORPORATION v. TD BANK N.A.
as 2:2018cv03663
Defendant:
TD BANK N.A.
Plaintiff:
ESSGEEKAY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
