Contract Cases
Osman v. Bor et al
as 1:2022cv00431
Plaintiff: Mohammad Osman
Defendant: Michael W. Bor, Thomas W. Stoltz, Rebecca Polak and others
Nominal Defendant: CarLotz, Inc.
Petitioner: W. Kenmore Cardoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sheen et al v. The United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00225
Plaintiff: Fang Lun Tsao, Fung I. Yuan, Wen-Wang Yang and others
Defendant: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
A. Bors Properties, LLC v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. MPL1442964.15
as 4:2017cv00671
Plaintiff: A. Bors Properties, LLC
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. MPL1442964.15
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Padmanabhan v. Ctrs. for Medicare & Medicaid, et al
as 15-2268
Plaintiff - Appellant: BHARANIDHARAN PADMANABHAN
Defendant - Appellee: CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, (Boston Regional Office), RAYMOND HURD and WILLIAM KASSLER
Defendant: SIMON AHTARIDIS, M.D., MOACIR BARBOSA, ALLISON BAYER and others
Respondent: JULIAN HARRIS, JAMES PAIKOS, STEPHEN HOCTOR and others
EL BOR CORP. v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE CO. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv05005
Plaintiff: EL BOR CORP.
Defendant: FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE CO. and FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract None
McElwee Grp v. Mun Auth Bor Elverson, et al
as 09-3468
Plaintiff - Appellant: MCELWEE GRP
Defendant - Appellee: SPOTTS STEVENS & MCCOY INC and BOR OF ELVERSON
Defendant - Non-Participating: MUN AUTH BOR ELVERSON
CMA-CGM (America), Inc. v. Bor Tong International Development, Inc.
as 1:2007cv07806
Plaintiff: CMA-CGM (America), Inc.
Defendant: Bor Tong International Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1701 Violation of Shipping Act of 1984

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?