Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sherman v. Ellison et al
as 3:2020cv05255
Defendant:
Safra A. Catz, Vishal Sikka, Bruce R. Chizen and others
Plaintiff:
Alison Sherman
Chugh et al v. Oracle Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv00764
Defendant:
Safra A. Catz, Bruce R. Chizen, William G. Parrett and others
Plaintiff:
Rajiv Chugh and Sarita Chugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acuity v. Catz Construction & Framing, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02385
Plaintiff:
Acuity
Defendant:
Catz Construction & Framing, LLC, Lyons Ridge Apartments, L.P. and Patton & Taylor Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosenblum et al v. Oracle America, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01532
Defendant:
Stephen Bartolo, Thomas Budnar, Safra Catz and others
Plaintiff:
Oregon Health Insurance ExchangeCorporation, Ellen Rosenblum and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Ozaki v. Ellison et al
as 3:2011cv04493
Plaintiff:
Scott Ozaki, Lisa Galaviz and Philip T. Prince
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Ellison, Safra A. Catz, Jeffrey O. Henley and others
Interested Party:
Attorney Jerry K. Cimmet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prince v. Berg et al
as 3:2010cv04233
Plaintiff:
Philip T. Prince and Lisa Galaviz
Defendant:
Jeffrey S. Berg, H. Raymond Bingham, Michael J. Boskin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re Oracle Corporation Derivative Litigation
as 3:2010cv03392
Plaintiff:
Lisa Galaviz and Philip T Prince
Defendant:
Jeffrey S. Berg, H Raymond Bingham, Michael J. Boskin and others
Interested Party:
Jerry K. Cimmet, John M. Kelson and Scott Ozaki
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Melchor Jayme v. MCI Corp, et al
as 08-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELCHOR R. JAYME
Defendant - Appellee:
BUSCH, Executive Staff, GERALD CATZ, Executive Staff and MCI CORP, Executive Staff
JAYME v. MCI CORPORATION et al
as 3:2007cv00055
Plaintiff:
MELCHOR R. JAYME
Defendant:
MCI CORPORATION, GERALD B. CATZ and BUSCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
