Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DENOVO BIOPHARMA LLC v. LABCORP DRUG DEVELOPMENT INC.
as 3:2022cv07548
Defendant:
LABCORP DRUG DEVELOPMENT INC. and COVANCE INC.
Plaintiff:
DENOVO BIOPHARMA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Physeon GmbH v. Covance Inc.
as 0:2020cv00758
Defendant:
Covance Inc.
Plaintiff:
Physeon GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TECHFIELDS PHARMA CO., LTD. v. COVANCE, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv01148
Plaintiff:
TECHFIELDS PHARMA CO., LTD.
Defendant:
COVANCE, INC. and FISHER CLINICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Covance, Inc. v. InClin, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00429
Plaintiff:
Covance, Inc.
Defendant:
InClin, Inc. and Hope Davies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KAREN MILLINER v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01015
Defendant:
COVANCE, INC. DISABILITY PLAN and LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KAREN MILLINER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
CAMPBELL v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, et al.
as 1:2013cv00949
Plaintiff:
MARGARET CAMPBELL
Defendant:
COVANCE, INC. DISABILITY PLAN and LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MDS, INC. et al v. COVANCE, INC. et al
as 3:2007cv03207
Plaintiff:
MDS, INC. and MDS PHARMA SERVICES (US) INC.
Defendant:
COVANCE, INC. and NIGEL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MDS INC. et al v. COVANCE INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00455
Plaintiff:
MDS INC., MDS INC., MDS INC. and others
Defendant:
COVANCE INC., COVANCE INC., NIGEL BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
COVANCE INC. v. DIXON et al
as 1:2007cv00409
Plaintiff:
COVANCE INC. and COVANCE INC.
Defendant:
JAMES DIXON, JAMES DIXON and MDS PHARMA SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
