Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Steffens v. Block et al
as 1:2024cv04481
Plaintiff:
Joshua Steffens
Defendant:
Peter Block, John Collins, Ernest Cu and others
Mark McAuley v. Northfield Insurance Company
as 24-1421
Plaintiff:
MARK JOSEPH MCAULEY
Defendant:
NORTHFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, SUNSHINE 11, LLC, d/b/a Relax Inn, USHA PATEL and others
Lavan v. Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv04207
Plaintiff:
Beverly Lavan
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McAuley v. Northfield Insurance Company et al
as 4:2022cv02376
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph McAuley
Defendant:
Northfield Insurance Company, Sunshine 11, LLC doing business as Relax Inn, Usha Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Lavan v. Parrish et al
as 2:2019cv04496
Defendant:
Dolores Parrish and Richard Parrish
Plaintiff:
Julie Lavan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LAVAN v. PARRISH et al
as 1:2019cv12706
Defendant:
DOLORES PARRISH and RICHARD PARRISH
Plaintiff:
JULIE LAVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
National Distribution Warehouse Inc. v. General Wireless Operations Inc. d/b/a RadioShack et al
as 1:2017cv00753
Defendant:
General Wireless Operations Inc., Robert Lavan and Standard General L.P.
Plaintiff:
National Distribution Warehouse Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Evergreen Media Holdings, LLC et al v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP et al
as 2:2015cv01648
Plaintiff:
Tony Derosa-Grund and Evergreen Media Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Does, John M. Gatti, David McGriff and others
Stroock and Stroock and Lavan LLP v. RGM Entertainment PTE Ltd et al
as 2:2013cv00336
Respondent:
Devesh Chetty and RGM Entertainment PTE Ltd
Petitioner:
Stroock and Stroock and Lavan LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
