Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Reiff v. Homesite Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv07176
Plaintiff:
Charles Reiff
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Reiff v. Progressive Property Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv04724
Plaintiff:
Charles Reiff
Defendant:
Progressive Property Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
RD Real Estate Debt Fund II, L.P. v. Reiff
as 1:2022cv02786
Plaintiff:
RD Real Estate Debt Fund, II, L.P. and RD Real Estate Debt Fund II, L.P.
Defendant:
Tiffany A. Reiff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Reiff et al v. Thor Motor Coach Inc
as 3:2014cv02100
Plaintiff:
Nan Reiff and Ken Reiff
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company v. AFA Financial Group, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01073
Defendant:
AFA Financial Group, LLC, Cholye An, Young Tae An and others
Counter Defendant:
Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company
Counter Claimant:
Michael T Nommensen
Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance Company v. Cole et al
as 3:2010cv00428
Plaintiff:
Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jamie Cole, James H Howell, Linda K Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REIFF et al v. GAF MATERIALS CORP.
as 2:2010cv01142
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M. REIFF and DOMINIQUE REIFF
Defendant:
GAF MATERIALS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CRAWFORD et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00582
Plaintiff:
MARC CRAWFORD, FLORENCE DIBENEDETTO, PHYLLIS REIFF and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK/SCHERING-PLOUGH PHARMACEUTICALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
