Cases 1 - 7 of 7
U. S. ex rel. Szymoniak v. American Home Mortgage Serv
as 15-1720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL. LYNN E. SZYMONIAK
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL. LYNN E. SZYMONIAK
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INCORPORATED, SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Citi Residential Lending Inc., f/k/a AMC Mortgage Services Inc., WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, d/b/a America's Servicing Company, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, as successor in interest to Lasalle Bank and others
Party-in-Interest:
ROGERS TOWNSEND & THOMAS, PC
:
BLACK v. R.B.C. BANK et al
as 1:2012cv00407
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. BLACK
Defendant:
R.B.C. BANK, P.N.C. BANK, USA BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. Stonebridge Life Ins. Co. et al
as 3:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Annette Gibbs Parker
Defendant:
Stonebridge Life Ins. Co. , Trustee of the J.C. Penney Group Ins. Fund , J.C. Penney Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks et al v. Capital One (USA) Bank National Association
as 3:2011cv05346
Plaintiff:
Loren Brooks and Kathryn Brooks
Defendant:
Capital One (USA) Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pane et al v. USA Bank
as 2:2010cv04820
Plaintiff:
First Lincoln Mortgage Corp. and Salvatore Pane
Defendant:
USA Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Parkville Plaza, LLC v. USA Bank
as 3:2009cv00618
Plaintiff:
Parkville Plaza, LLC
Defendant:
USA Bank
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Beaumont et al v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company et al
as 4:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Louis Beaumont, Louis Beaumont, Louis Beaumont and others
Defendant:
Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, Time Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
