Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Misty Dawn Hillard Trust et al v. Crudup et al
as 3:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Misty Dawn Hillard Trust, Amuur Matiyn El Trust and Andre Lemaurio Johnson
Defendant:
Moneisha Crudup doing business as Moneisha Crudup, Vice President of Truist f/k/a Suntrust and William Rogers doing business as William Rogers, Chief Executive Officer of Truist, f/k/a Suntrust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Grange Insurance Association v. Rogers et al
as 4:2020cv09147
Plaintiff:
Grange Insurance Association
Defendant:
William Rogers and Helen Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 0:2019cv62644
Plaintiff:
William Rogers and Areta Rogers
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BC5 44 LLC v. New Millennium Building Systems et al
as 2:2018cv02534
Defendant:
Steel Dynamics Incorporated, Consolidated Systems Incorporated and New Millennium Building Systems LLC
Plaintiff:
BC5 44 LLC
Cross Defendant:
Ocilla Investments LLC, Louise R Slater, George Williams Rogers Grandchildren's Trust 1994 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Rogers et al
as 4:2012cv04029
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Johnson
Defendant:
Anne Paige Rogers, Mary E. Rogers, Kevin Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRUE PRODUCT ID, INC. v. DUNAVANT
as 2:2009cv00329
Plaintiff:
TRUE PRODUCT ID, INC.
Defendant:
WILLIAM ROGER DUNAVANT
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BIOFIELD CORP. v. DUNAVANT
as 2:2008cv06044
Plaintiff:
BIOFIELD CORP.
Defendant:
WILLIAM ROGER DUNAVANT
Cause Of Action: Diversity
American Home Mortgage Corp. v. Innovative Mortgage Solutions, LLC. et al
as 2:2007cv02013
Plaintiff:
American Home Mortgage Corp.
Defendant:
Innovative Mortgage Solutions, LLC., William Rogers and Kathleen Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
