Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Holmes v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv04173
Plaintiff:
Joseph Holmes
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Phoenix Publishing, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv09386
Defendant:
Backseatcuddler.com, Does, Joshua Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Mavrix Photo, Inc.
TAS Rights Management, LLC v. Various John Does et al
as 3:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
TAS Rights Management, LLC
Defendant:
Nicholas Daley, Edwin Cooper, Sam Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc v. Nick Holmes et al
as 2:2013cv00867
Defendant:
Does, Nick Holmes and Samir Sahyoun
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc
HOLMES et al v. MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
as 1:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH HOLMES and THERANOS, INC.
Defendant:
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holmes et al v. Myers Industries, Inc.
as 2:2012cv14327
Plaintiff:
James Holmes and Safety Trigo, Inc.
Defendant:
Myers Industries, Inc.
Holmes v. Goldsmith et al
as 1:2012cv10157
Defendant:
Rebecca Goldsmith and Desert Diamond Crochet, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Holmes
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Theranos, Inc. et al v. Fuisz Technologies, Ltd. et al
as 5:2011cv05236
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Matus Fuisz, Fuisz Pharma LLC, Richard C. Fuisz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Theranos, Inc. et al v. Fuisz Technologies, Ltd. et al
as 3:2011cv05236
Plaintiff:
Theranos, Inc. and Elizabeth Holmes
Defendant:
Fuisz Technologies, Ltd., John R. Fuisz , Richard C. Fuisz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Alki David et al v. CBS Interactive Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03807
Defendant:
CNET Networks, Inc., Lime Wire LLC, CBS Interactive Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Detron Bendross, Emmanuel Ramone DeAnda, Jerome Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
