Cases 51 - 60 of 83
APP DYNAMIC EHF v. VIGNISSON
as 1:2014cv01504
Plaintiff:
APP DYNAMIC EHF
Defendant:
ERLING ORMAR VIGNISSON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
APPS Broadcast Network Incorporated v. Thomas et al
as 2:2014cv01717
Plaintiff:
APPS Broadcast Network Incorporated
Defendant:
David A Thomas, Unknown Thomas, Jeffrey P Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
App Annie Inc. v. Apptopia, Inc.
as 3:2014cv03370
Plaintiff:
App Annie Inc.
Defendant:
Apptopia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
App Annie Inc. v. Apptopia, Inc.
as 3:2014cv03369
Plaintiff:
App Annie Inc.
Defendant:
Apptopia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
WAG ACQUISITION, L.L.C. v. FLYING CROCODILE, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02674
Plaintiff:
WAG ACQUISITION, L.L.C.
Defendant:
FLYING CROCODILE, INC., FCI, INC., ACCRETIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Chanel, Inc. v. replica-chanel.org et al
as 0:2014cv60631
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
replica-chanel.org, macebay.com, myluxurytaste.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
JUST KIDSTUFF, INC. v. SNIPSNAP APP LCC et al
as 5:2013cv05983
Plaintiff:
JUST KIDSTUFF, INC.
Defendant:
SNIPSNAP APP LCC and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Remote Locator Systems, LLC v. Life360, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00673
Plaintiff:
Remote Locator Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Life360, Inc., Glympse, Inc. , GT Media, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eclat Pharmaceuticals LLC v. West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp et al
as 2:2013cv06252
Defendant:
APP Pharmaceuticals Inc, American Regent Inc and West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp
Plaintiff:
Eclat Pharmaceuticals LLC
Zherebko v. Reutskyy et al
as 3:2013cv00843
Plaintiff:
Andrey Zherebko
Defendant:
Viktor Reutskyy, Nataliya Galifianakis and App. Otizito, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
