Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Spin Master Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv05855
Plaintiff:
Spin Master Ltd. and Spin Master Toys UK Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, A3QG4GFKU46UH7, CGR Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Beckham et al v. Baker & Hostetler, LLP et al
as 1:2022cv04420
Plaintiff:
Brittany Fletcher Beckham and Lutzy, Inc.
Defendant:
Baker & Hostetler, LLP and Gregory Grissett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
25 Thrasio Twenty Five, Inc. v. Dincer Soyocak
as 3:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
25 Thrasio Five, Inc. and 25 Thrasio Twenty Five, Inc.
Defendant:
Dincer Soyocak an individual doing business as Beckham Luxury Linens
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Ramales v. Victoria Beckham Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08650
Plaintiff:
Felipe Ramales
Defendant:
Victoria Beckham, Victoria Beckham Inc. and VB Beauty (US) LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc v. Todd Beckham et al
as 2:2012cv06528
Defendant:
Todd Beckham and Does
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc
1524948 Alberta Ltd. v. Quibids, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv05686
Plaintiff:
1524948 Alberta Ltd.
Defendant:
Quibids, LLC, Matt Beckham and Intermark Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Harris v. Beckham
as 8:2010cv00759
Plaintiff:
Tommy Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Barry Beckham
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Realty Executives International Inc v. Midtown Realty LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00250
Plaintiff:
Realty Executives International Inc, Realty Executives International Inc and Realty Executives International Inc
Defendant:
Midtown Realty LLC and Jocelyn Beckham
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
