Cases 11 - 20 of 139
Lilak v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2022cv01121
Plaintiff:
Safdar Neil Lilak
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Francis v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv10789
Plaintiff:
Neil Francis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Wiley Neil Johnson, II
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Neil Graham Ives v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv09383
Plaintiff:
Neil Graham Ives
Defendant:
Kikolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bullock v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv00118
Plaintiff:
Wiley Neil Bullock
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TOMCZAK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2021cv14107
Plaintiff:
THOMAS NEIL TOMCZAK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bush v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00100
Plaintiff:
Neil Edwin Bush
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roney v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv00422
Plaintiff:
Neil Deon Roney
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kiolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alpahando v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00649
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Neil E Alpahando
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Neil v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv06414
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Neil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
