Cases 31 - 40 of 8,430
David Meyers v. Nancy Hill
as 22-1095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY B. HILL, Acting Comminssioner of Social Security Administration, ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, MICHELL STOLLS and others
Barnett v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00047
Plaintiff:
Randall Lee Barnett
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tanya Makela v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 22-1047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TANYA RAE MAKELA
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, named as Andrew Saul
Johnson v. Saul
as 1:2021cv02609
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Seed v. Saul
as 1:2022cv00683
Plaintiff:
Milbern Seed
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Watkins v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jennifer C. Watkins
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sherwood v. Saul
as 7:2021cv10847
Plaintiff:
Brian Sherwood Jr and Brian Sherwood
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lewis v. Kijakazi
as 6:2021cv01316
Plaintiff:
Justin C Lewis
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pender v. Kijakazi
as 5:2020cv00228
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Plaintiff:
Roycelia Leilan Pender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Maria Espinoza Thatcher v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv01343
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Plaintiff:
Maria Espinoza Thatcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
