Cases 31 - 40 of 5,962
Goodale v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Cindi Anne Goodale
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Felts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kelly Ann Felts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CHATHAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
CARRIE ANN CHATHAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Scherer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2024cv80431
Plaintiff:
Terrie Jo Ann Scherer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Canestro v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02630
Plaintiff:
Nancy Anne Canestro
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Crane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06204
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ann Crane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Latimer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2024cv02571
Plaintiff:
Wendi Anne Latimer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bennett v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Bennett
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hill v. S Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06198
Plaintiff:
Rachael Ann Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Hassie Ann Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
