Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Roberto Gama v. Carolyn W. Colvin et al
as 2:2014cv03633
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Doe 1
Plaintiff:
Roberto Gama
Teodor Marian v. Kathleen Sebelius et al
as 2:2014cv02200
Defendant:
Acting Administrator, Michael Astrue, Elizabeth Bake and others
Plaintiff:
Teodor Marian
A Prescription Drug Plan With Medicare, Contract Offered By Silver Script Insurance Company:
Silver Script
Terry Joseph Cattano v. Carolyn W. Colvin et al
as 2:2014cv00518
Plaintiff:
Terry Joseph Cattano
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Does
Tia Sharon Reed v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 5:2013cv01788
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Does
Plaintiff:
Tia Sharon Reed
Tia Sharon Reed v. Commissoner of Social Security et al
as 5:2013cv01375
Defendant:
Commissoner of Social Security and Does
Plaintiff:
Tia Sharon Reed
Shaughnessy v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Brian Shaughnessy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Michael Astrue, Malia Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Doe v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
William T Doe
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Purisima v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2013cv01068
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, CRST, Inc., Midlands Claim Administrators, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
THORNTON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 4:2013cv00019
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Doe v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv40152
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
