Cases 51 - 60 of 892
Grimes v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Phillip Grimes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Amy Phillips v. Comm of Social Security
as 23-1368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMY V. PHILLIPS, fka Amy V. Swartout
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Phillips v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Dixie J. Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gonzales v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02328
Plaintiff:
Phillip Gonzales
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Tina Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Phillips v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
April D Phillips
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Claxton v. SSA
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Phillip Larry Claxton
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Phillips v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2023cv10517
Plaintiff:
Esther Phillips
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Miller v. SSA
as 3:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dwayne Miller, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Seymore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Phillip Seymore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
