Cases 1 - 10 of 1,496
KEATING v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv07011
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN H. KEATING
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Maybury v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv04099
Plaintiff:
Daniell H. Maybury
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Murdoch v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Mark H Murdoch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Shoecraft v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Ronald H. Shoecraft
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roberson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Teresa H. Roberson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Valverde v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv01911
Plaintiff:
Eric H. Valverde
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley, Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Ferida Moy v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1461
Plaintiff:
FERIDA H. MOY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Schultz v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Kamina Helene Schultz and Kamina H. Schultz
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Leonard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
James H. Leonard, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
