Cases 1 - 10 of 5,588
Teat v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01468
Plaintiff:
William Aaron Teat, Sr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Simmons v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
William Simmons
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Lachenal v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv03839
Plaintiff:
William Gardner Lachenal
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Nicholls v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Timothy William Nicholls
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Toby Edward Williams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Jessica L. Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05378
Plaintiff:
William Reynolds
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hogan v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
William Hogan
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Georgetta Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Deborah L. Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
