Cases 1 - 10 of 856
Fisher o/b/o A.L.M., a minor, o/b/o Edwin Maldonado, deceased, et al
as 1:2024cv04127
Plaintiff:
Amanda Fisher o/b/o A.L.M., a minor, o/b/o Edwin Maldonado, deceased, and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Armstrong v. Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wray Hope Armstrong
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roesch v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
Amanda D. Roesch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Calabria v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hope Calabria
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Amanda M. Stoican v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Stoican
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
McQueen v. O'Malley, Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv11133
Plaintiff:
Amanda L McQueen
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Clark v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Amanda K. Clark
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Walker v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06058
Plaintiff:
Amanda Walker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Amanda Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-11233
Plaintiff:
AMANDA SMITH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Parker v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Amanda R. Parker
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
