Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Leifker v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00423
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Mr. Brian Scott Leifker and Brian Scott Leifker
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Green v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2019cv00130
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Handel v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv01731
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Handel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Gage v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
as 1:2017cv00725
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Gage
Notice Only:
US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barrett v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv04660
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Barrett
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
REILLY v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2016cv02622
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SCOTT REILLY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Miller v. Social Security
as 2:2016cv11628
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brian Scott Wade v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01789
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Wade
Bodtke v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv01779
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Bodtke
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Moore v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00815
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Moore, II
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
