Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Conrad v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01819
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Mary F. Conrad
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Younger v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Conrad Younger
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CONRAD v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
MARTHA CONRAD
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Conrad v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00899
Plaintiff:
Cyrstal Marie Conrad
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Conrad v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Crystal Marie Conrad
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Conrad v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
Shawn J Conrad
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Love v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Conrad Love
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Czajkowski v. Commissioner, SSA
as 23-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONRAD J. CZAJKOWSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, SSA
Conrad v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05732
Plaintiff:
Jamie K Conrad
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Proffitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
William Conrad Proffitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
