Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Haik v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Marla Gay Haik
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Perotto v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Sherry Gay Perotto
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gay v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv01522
Plaintiff:
Ryan David Gay
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
GAY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv02439
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GAY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GAY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv01612
Plaintiff:
EMILY CHRISTINE GAY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jansen v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Sonda Gay Jansen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gay v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv04220
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gay
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Allen Medina v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv01872
Plaintiff:
Deborah Gay Allen Medina
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Glenn v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00300
Plaintiff:
Pamela Gay Glenn
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(SS) Morgan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00694
Plaintiff:
Wendy Gay Morgan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
