Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Rott v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, et al
as 14-6152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. ROTT
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, JAY HARRINGTON and others
United States
as 2:2014cv00474
Defendant:
Bill Sunga Modina
Plaintiff:
United States
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Herbert Fletcher v. Douglas Shulman, et al
as 14-10282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT FLETCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner IRS and Individually, STEVEN T. MILLER, Acting Commissioner IRS and Individually, BILL R. BANOWSKY, IRS Employee in an Ogden, Utah Office and Individually and others
Overton v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv01018
Plaintiff:
Bill Max Overton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6213
Rott v. Oklahoma Tax Commission et al
as 5:2013cv01041
Plaintiff:
John E Rott
Defendant:
Oklahoma Tax Commission , Oklahoma State of , Jay L Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fletcher v. Shulman et al
as 3:2013cv02090
Defendant:
Douglas Shulman , Steven T Miller , Bill R Banowsky and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Andrew Hok-San Thio v. Crown Anesthesia Medical Group Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00516
Defendant:
Dayna Cross, Michael L Cross, Crown Anesthesia Medical Group Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hok-San Thio
United States Of America v. Jones
as 5:2013cv00123
Respondent:
Bill J. Jones
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Overton v. United State
as 12-6251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL MAX OVERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America et al v. Benson
as 3:2012cv04892
Petitioner:
United States of America and Bill Ryder
Respondent:
Burton O. Benson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
