Cases 51 - 60 of 165
United States of America v. O'Brien
as 8:2017cv01007
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Timothy O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340
United States of America v. Rod Riordan, Inc. et al
as 7:2017cv00071
Defendant:
Midland County Tax Assessor-Collector, R. O. Pomroy Equipment Rental, Inc., Kali Riordan and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UMEUKEJE et al
as 2:2017cv02345
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PATRICK O. UMEUKEJE, PETS ON A BUDGET, INC and EASTLAND VETERINARY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Isagba et al
as 5:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joyce O. Isagba and David O. Isagba
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Isagba et al
as 3:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joyce O. Isagba and David O. Isagba
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Jimmie O. Clements v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2017mc00111
Movant:
Jimmie O. Clements
Respondent:
Michael L. Hervey and United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Pacheco et al
as 1:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Manual O Pacheco, Debra K. Pacheco, Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Taxation and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
USA v. Bruno Schmidt, et al
as 17-35024
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
BRUNO W. SCHMIDT and CHARLENE O. SCHMIDT
R&O Construction Company v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00762
Plaintiff:
R&O Construction Company
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
United States of America v. Bruch
as 2:2016cv00315
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Matthew O. Bruch
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
