Cases 71 - 80 of 109
United States of America v. Wicks et al
as 5:2011cv05027
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dennis R. Wicks, Frank C. Ozak and M. Dean Jorgensen
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
USA v. Merrill Lynch Business Financi, et al
as 11-1143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC and MERRILL LYNCH COMMERCIAL FIN CORP
Third Party - Appellee:
ANTHONY MINERVINI, CHARLES BECKER and FRANK VICARI
United States of America v. Stricklen et al
as 1:2010cv00292
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Frank Stricklen, Frances S Thompson, Barbara Stricklen and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Day et al v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv01950
Petitioner:
Frank B. Day and FBD Management, Inc.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Day et al v. USA
as 1:2010cv01949
Petitioner:
Frank B. Day and Day Management, Inc.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
United States of America v. Gwenn Wycoff et al
as 2:2010cv05856
Defendant:
Frank Ozak and Gwenn Wycoff
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Frank Daniel Sigala
as 2:2010cv05519
Respondent:
Frank Daniel Sigala
Petitioner:
United States of America
United States of America et al v. Minter
as 3:2010cv00658
Petitioner:
United States of America and Rick Siren
Respondent:
Frank Minter
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Barnett et al v. D'Amico et al
as 2:2010cv01928
Plaintiff:
William B Barnett and Amelia A. Barnett
Defendant:
Frank J D'Amico, Jr, Frank J. D'Amico, APLC, Jr., Capitelli & Wicker, APLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gangi et al v. United States of America
as 6:2010cv01138
Petitioner:
Frank Gangi , Global NAPS, Inc. and BABP VI, LLC
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
