Cases 91 - 100 of 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tonya Baker et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as CAC/2:02-16-08542
Plaintiff:
Tonya Baker , Partricia Terry , Clarence Terry and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. , McKesson Corporation and Does
In re: Liang-Houh Shieh v. State Bar of California, et al
as 16-56556
:
In re: LIANG-HOUH SHIEH, A Member of the Bar in Good Standing
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF BAR COURT OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, PAUL A. TURNER and others
Movant - Appellant:
LIANG HOUH SHIEH, Attorney, Bar No. 128034
Charles Williams v. USA
as 16-30240
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jandrain et al v. Julien
as 8:2016mc00135
Counter Defendant:
Brent Clatterbuck, Charles Clatterbuck, Robert Clatterbuck and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Clatterbuck, Charles Clatterbuck, Robert Clatterbuck and others
Counter Claimant:
William Edward Julien
Defendant:
William Edward Julien
Creditor:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of William Edward Julien
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
US v. Phillip William
as 16-7297
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILLIP JAMES WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ
In re: James Thoma
as 16-6106
Movant:
In re: JAMES WILLIAM THOMAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. James Estes, Jr.
as 16-60394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM ESTES, JR., also known as Jim Estes, also known as Samson Jenkins
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
