Cases 101 - 110 of 114
Direct Purchaser Class, et al v. Foamex Innovations, Inc.
as 11-4118
:
In re: POLYURETHANE FOAM ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS, INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS and PIAZZA'S CARPET & TILE SHOP, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
FOAMEX INNOVATIONS, INC.
In re: Publication Paper
as 11-101
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Gardella, Jr., o/b/o himself & all others similarly situated formerly doing business as FCP Webindery Inc., Technolith Inc, o/b/o himself & all others similarly situated formerly doing business as FCP Webindery Inc., Larry Weiss, o/b/o himself & all others similarly situated formerly doing business as Forms Inc. and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Acorn/Parliament Paper Inc., o/b/o itself & all others similarly situated, Digital Color Imaging, Inc., o/b/o itself & all others similarly situated and Austin Printing Co. Inc., individually and o/b/o all others similarly situated
Defendant:
International Paper Co., Meadwestvaco Corp., Norske Skogindustrier ASA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Stora Enso Oyj and Stora Enso North America Corp.
In Re: Publication Paper
as 11-101
Plaintiff:
Chris Young, Thomas Muldoon, Indirect Purchaser Plaintiff, Donna McCann, o/b/o herself & all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Bowater, Inc., Metsalitto Group, Norske Skog (USA) Holdings Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Stora Enso North America Corp. and Stora Enso Oyj
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Digital Color Imaging, Inc., o/b/o itself & all others similarly situated, Austin Printing Co. Inc., individually and o/b/o all others similarly situated and Acorn/Parliament Paper Inc., o/b/o itself & all others similarly situated
In re: Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2010md02196
Plaintiff:
Direct Action Plaintiff(s), Direct Purchaser Class, Indirect Purchaser Class and others
Defendant:
Defendants Liaison Counsel
Petitioner:
Arsenal Capital Partners
Special Master:
David Rosenblum Cohen
Intervenor:
The Dow Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2010md02143
Plaintiff:
Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., Alex Afanasyev and others
Defendant:
BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Petitioner:
John Doe 1 and Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.
Other:
Christopher Andrews, Debbie Bosse, Mr. Stephen Field and others
Not Yet Classified:
All Parties, Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple Inc.
Intervenor:
Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology and U.S. Department of J Antitrust Division
Interested Party:
Patrick S. Sweeney, Gregory Starrett and Newegg Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HIP HEALTH PLAN OF F, et al v. SCHERING-PLOUGH, et al
as 2:2001cv01652
Plaintiff:
HIP HEALTH PLAN OF FLORIDA, INC. , Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs and Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs
Consol_plaintiff:
AMY REICHERT , GREAT LAKES HEALTH PLAN, INC. , ROSEEN and others
Pecial_master:
STEPHEN M. ORLOFSKY
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Minn-Chem, Incorporated, et al v. Agrium Incorporated, et al
as 10-1712
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MINN-CHEM, INCORPORATED, GAGE'S FERTILIZER & GRAIN, INCORPORATED, INDIRECT PURCHASERS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AGRIUM INCORPORATED, MOSAIC COMPANY, POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN, INCORPORATED and others
Agrium Incorporated, et al v. Minn-Chem, Incorporated, et al
as 10-8007
Petitioner:
AGRIUM INCORPORATED, MOSAIC COMPANY, POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN, INCORPORATED and others
Respondent:
MINN-CHEM, INCORPORATED, GAGE'S FERTILIZER & GRAIN, INCORPORATED, INDIRECT PURCHASERS and others
In Re: Chocolate Confectionary, et al
as 09-8027
Plaintiff - Respondent:
DIRECT PURCHASERS, INDIRECT PURCHASES, INDIRECT END USERS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
NESTLE USA INC, CADBURY ADAMS CANADA INC, HERSHEY CANADA INC and others
Defendant - Respondent:
CADBURY PLC, CADBURY HOLDINGS LTD, FKA Cadbury Schweppes PLC, HERSHEY USA INC and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Respondent:
GOVT OF CANADA
Aftermarket Automotive Lighting Products Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2009ml02007
Plaintiff:
Flash Sales, Inc., Harold's Autobody, Motoring Parts International and others
Defendant:
Depo Auto Parts Ind Co Ltd, Sabry Lee Limited, Genera Corporation and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Travis Burau, Trang Nguyen, National Auto Parts, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Westminster Mutual Insurance Company
In Re:
Aftermarket Automotive Lighting Products Antiitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
