Cases 101 - 110 of 120
Acosta v. Hong et al
as 2:2017mc00072
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Zhao "Jenny" Zeng Hong
Garnishee:
Lee Smart PS INC
R. Alexander Acosta et al v. Authentic Brothers Towing, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00922
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta and Judith Vasquez
Defendant:
Authentic Brothers Towing, Inc. and Francisco Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acosta v. Stanley
as 17-1619
Petitioner:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor
Respondent:
KEN STANLEY, d/b/a A+ Roofing
Acosta v. JY Harvesting Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01225
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
JY Harvesting Inc. and Jose Jesus Pinedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00959
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
A.C. Castle Construction Co. v. Acosta, et al
as 17-1537
Petitioner:
A.C. CASTLE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Interested Party:
DARYL J. PROVENCHER, d/b/a Provencher Home Improvement
Respondent:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor and US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Acosta v. Starkweather et al
as 4:2017mc00016
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Scott Starkweather and Tina Starkweather
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Acosta v. Al Qaderi, Inc. et al
as 8:2017mc00059
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Al Qaderi, Inc. and Mujahed Elbooz
Cause Of Action: Administrative Subpoena
Acosta v. North Providence Primary Care Associates Inc. et al
as 1:2017mc00019
Petitioner:
R Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
North Providence Primary Care Associates Inc., North Providence Urgent Care, Inc., Center of New England Primary Care, Inc. and others
Stephen Munn v. US Department of Labor, et al
as 17-60342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN B. MUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DIVISION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
