Other Statutes Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 1,416
Knapp v. Morgan Stanley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00839
Plaintiff: Lawrence Knapp
Defendant: Morgan Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff: Galmi, Amram Galmi, Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Deborah Griffin, BBVA Securities, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Funds and others
Interested Party: East 71, Ltd., Brahman Partners II, L.P., Brahman Partners III, L.P. and others
Petitioner: Waterford Township Police and Fire Retirement System, Barry Baker, Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement System of Chicago and others
Consolidated Defendant: Shlomo Yanai, Yitzhak Peterburg, Yaacov Altman and others
Intervenor: United States of America and HMG Global Initiative Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff: Certain funds and accounts managed by TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC and Teachers Advisors LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC on behalf of certain of its managed funds and accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Albert Nicholas Horvath v. Rivian Automotive, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv00444
Plaintiff: Albert Nicholas Horvath
Defendant: Rivian Automotive, Inc., Robert J. Scaringe, Claire McDonough and others
Petitioner: Theodore Magen and Gerald Royer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Carpenter v. Oscar Health, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03885
Plaintiff: Lorin Carpenter
Defendant: Oscar Health, Inc., Mario Schlosser, Siddhartha Sankaran and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
IN RE DIDI GLOBAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv05807
Plaintiff: RAFAELA ESPINAL, Shereen El-Nahas, Bosco Wang and others
Defendant: DIDI GLOBAL INC. F/K/A XIAOJU KUAIZHI INC., WILL WEI CHENG, ALAN YUE ZHUO and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Jatin Chopra, Michal Kucharski and Cory Hechler
Petitioner: Fah Liew, Junhong Cao, Yibin Wang and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Tao Zha
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Jatin Chopra v. Didi Global Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05973
Plaintiff: Jatin Chopra
Defendant: Didi Global Inc.f/k/a Xiaoju Kuaizhi Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., Boci Asia Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Hechler v. Didi Global Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07550
Plaintiff: CORY HECHLER
Defendant: DIDI GLOBAL INC. F/K/A XIAOJU KUAIZHI INC., WILL WEI CHENG, ALAN YUE ZHUO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
City of Providence, Rhode v. Bats Global Markets, Inc.
as 22-920
Plaintiff: Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Forsta AP-fonden, StateBoston Retirement System and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Providence, Rhode Island, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Employees' Retirement System of the Government of the Virgin Islands, United Association National Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Wedbush Securities, Inc., Tradework Inc., Bids Trading, L.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Direct Edge ECN, L.L.C., The Nasdaq Stock Market L.L.C. and others
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Gupta
as 1:2020cv03386
Defendant: Rajesh Gupta
Plaintiff: Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
Knapp v. Morgan Stanley
as 2:2022at00495
Plaintiff: Lawrence Knapp
Defendant: Morgan Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?