Cases 111 - 120 of 154
Syrek et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as CAC/8:13-cv-00987
Plaintiff:
John Syrek , Gregory Adams , Shirley McCoy and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and McKesson Corporation
US v. Michael Harriot
as 13-7022
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith
Smith et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-14412
Plaintiff:
Clara Smith and Michael Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Coloplast Corp.
Painters District Council No. 2 et al v. Park Mark, Inc. et al
as 2:2012mc09009
Plaintiff:
Painters District Council No. 2 , Gregg Smith , William Boevingloh and others
Defendant:
Park Mark, Inc.
Garnishee:
Missouri Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
SMITH et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00464
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH and VANESSA SMITH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv00275
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Defendant:
United States of America , United States Department of Interior , United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. 8971, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00778
Defendant:
8971, Inc., Eric Jewell and Michael Smith
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications
USA v. Shaun Smith
as 11-5883
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAUN MICHAEL SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
