Cases 111 - 120 of 167
Daniel Medford et al Kathleen Sebelius et al
as 0:2013cv01726
Plaintiff:
The QC Group Inc. , Daniel Medford and David DeVowe
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , Seth D. Harris , Jacob Lew and others
FLORIDA BANKERS ASSOCIATION, et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2013cv00529
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA BANKERS ASSOCIATION and TEXAS BANKERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, JACK LEW, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Infrastructure Alternatives, Inc. et al v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Infrastructure Alternatives, Inc. , William J. Cretens and Dana Trierweiler
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Hilda L. Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
NTEU v. FLRA
as 12-2574
Petitioner:
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Department of HHS, et al
as 11-11021
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through Pam Bondi Attorney General, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, by and through Alan Wilson Attorney General, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, HR POLICY ASSOCIATION, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
State of Nebraska, et al v. US Dept. of HHS, et al
as 12-3238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Nebraska, by and through, Jon C. Bruning, Attorney General of the State of Nebraska, State of South Carolina, by and through, Alan Wilson, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, State of Texas, by and through, Greg Abbott, Attorney General of the State of Texas and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Treasury and others
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al
as 11-11067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court:
JAMES F. BLUMSTEIN, THE INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Plaintiff:
HR POLICY ASSOCIATION
Holloman v. United States Department of Education et al
as 8:2012cv01759
Plaintiff:
Lonell Holloman
Defendant:
United States Department of Education, United States Department of Treasury and Florida Technical College
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Zaeretsky v. Maxi-Aids, Incorporated
as 12-3126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Feige Zaeretsky, AKA Feige Berlin and Aaron Berlin
Defendant:
M & H Incorporated, David Wacholder, John Doe, 1-9 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Maxi-Aids, Incorporated, Angela Giglio, Elliot Zaretsky and others
MILLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2012cv01255
Plaintiff:
MSHAIRI JONATHAN MILLER
Defendant:
D. SMITH and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
