Cases 141 - 150 of 550
California Air Resources Board, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-16793
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FORT BERTHOLD PROTECTORS OF WATER AND EARTH RIGHTS, CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior;, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Friends of the Floridas et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al.
as 2:2020cv00924
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Wilderness Alliance, Gila Resources Information Project, WildEarth Guardians and others
Defendant:
William Childress, United States Bureau of Land Management and David Wallace
Not Classified By Court:
US Attorney General and Civil Process Clerk of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. ROSS et al
as 1:2020cv02439
Defendant:
WILBUR ROSS, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and CHRIS OLIVER
Plaintiff:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, MIAMI WATERKEEPER and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540
Western Organization of Resource Councils et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management
as 4:2020cv00076
Plaintiff:
Montana Environmental Information Center, Western Organization of Resource Councils, Northern Plains Resource Council and others
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Citizens for a Healthy Community et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 1:2020cv02484
Defendant:
United State Bureau of Land Management, Jamie Connell, Stephanie Connolly and others
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians, High Country Conservation Advocates, Western Watersheds Project and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Dine Citizens Against Ruining our Environment et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 1:2020cv00673
Plaintiff:
Dine Citizens Against Ruining our Environment, Sierra Club, WildEarth Guardians and others
Defendant:
Tim Spisak, United States Bureau of Land Management, William Perry Pendley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Wildearth Guardians et al v. Skipwith et al
as 9:2020cv00097
Plaintiff:
Wildearth Guardians, Wilderness Watch and Wilderness Workshop
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Aurelia Skipwith
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Wildearth Guardians et al v. US Forest Service et al
as 2:2020cv00223
Defendant:
US Forest Service, Glenn Casamassa and Rodney Smoldon
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project, Wildearth Guardians and Kettle Range Conservation Group
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
350 Montana, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35410
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER, 350 MONTANA, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING, an agency within the U.S. Department of the Interior, MARGARET EVERSON, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director Exercising Authority of the Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, JOSEPH BALASH, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Land and Minerals Management of the U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
SIGNAL PEAK ENERGY, LLC
350 Montana, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35411
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH BALASH, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Land and Minerals Management of the U.S. Department of the Interior, DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency within the U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
SIGNAL PEAK ENERGY, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
