Cases 11 - 20 of 389
Sanchez-Argueta v. Garland
as 22-1685
Petitioner:
REYNA ESMERALDA SANCHEZ-ARGUETA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reyna Alfaro-Zelaya v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2069
Petitioner:
REYNA ELISA ALFARO-ZELAYA and E.J.A.Z.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Najera-Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1816
Petitioner:
REYNA DEL CARMEN NAJERA-GOMEZ and JUSTIN ORLANDO VASQUES-NAJERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Williams v. Gonzalez, et al.
as 23-1394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS and Tricky
Defendant / Appellee:
O. GONZALEZ, J. ANDRADE, E. CARMONA WALLACE and others
Reyna Benavides v. The Federal Department of Investigation
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Maria Guadalupe Reyna Benavides
Defendant:
The Federal Department of Investigation
Interested Party:
Anastacio R. Barrera
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
USA v. Reyna
as 23-10788
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Carlos Reyes Reyna
The Reynolds and Reynolds Company et al v. Charlotte Import Cars, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Reyna Capital Corporation doing business as Naked Lime Marketing, Reyna Capital Corporation and The Reynolds and Reynolds Company doing business as Naked Lime Marketing
Defendant:
Charlotte Import Cars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Marquez Garcia v. Garland
as 22-688
Petitioner:
REYNA MARQUEZ GARCIA, ABIMAEL EMIGDIO MARQUEZ, CARLOS EMIGDIO MARQUEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reyna Valenzuela De la Cruz, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-11320
Petitioner:
REYNA ELISETH VALENZUELA DE LA CRUZ and JEREMY DANIEL BAUTISTA VALENZUELA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
