Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Deluxe Media, Inc. v. Broadband iTV, Inc.
as 2:2021mc00958
Respondent:
Broadband iTV, Inc.
Petitioner:
Deluxe Media, Inc.
In Re:
Underlying Action: Broadband iTV, Inc., v. AT&T Services Inc., et al
Keating v. AT&T Services, Inc., et al
as 1:2021cv01024
Plaintiff:
Mark Keating
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC and AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
as 21-112
Respondent:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T CORP., CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, dba Verizon Wireless and others
Petitioner:
In re: VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
RAYMOND A. MERCADO, Ph.D.
Ponce v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 3:2020cv04924
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Ponce
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03801
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 20-1190
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Petitioner:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Intervenor:
Apple Inc., Broadcom Inc., Google LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
Southern Company, Benton Institute for Broadband & Society, Public Knowledge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
AT&T Capital Services, Inc. et al v. Geisenberger et al
as 1:2019cv02238
Plaintiff:
The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Mobility Supply, LLC, AT&T NCWS Holdings, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Richard J. Geisenberger, Brenda R. Mayrack and Michelle M. (Whitaker) Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
AT&T Services Inc v. Access Worldwide Communications Inc
as 3:2019cv02768
Plaintiff:
AT&T Services Inc
Defendant:
Access Worldwide Communications Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
