Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 14-1521
Defendant / Appellant: RANBAXY INC., RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff: SUPERVALU, INC., MEIJER, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party: JONATHAN RICH, EDWARD BREIVIK, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE, US PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATION FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES and others
Intervenor: EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 13-8044
Respondent: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS DISTRICT NO. 15 HEALTH FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 17 HEALTH CARE FUND, A.F. OF L. - A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN and others
Plaintiff: SUPERVALU, INC., MEIJER, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Petitioner: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., RANBAXY INC. and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS, LLC and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Intervenor: EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 13-8044
Plaintiff - Respondent: ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 17 HEALTH CARE FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND and others
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant - Petitioner: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Intervenor: EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 13-8043
Plaintiff - Respondent: ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 17 HEALTH CARE FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND and others
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant - Petitioner: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Intervenor: EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 13-8043
Respondent: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS DISTRICT NO. 15 HEALTH FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 17 HEALTH CARE FUND, A.F. OF L. - A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN and others
Plaintiff: SUPERVALU, INC., MEIJER, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Petitioner: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., RANBAXY INC. and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS, LLC and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Intervenor: EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Walgreen Co., et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al
as 12-15566
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant: WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified: HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re: EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master: JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party: IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff: Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner: TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Abbott Laboratories v. USDCOAK
as 10-71786
: In re: ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Petitioner: ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Respondent: USDC, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest: MEIJER, INC., MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. and others
IN RE: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2009md02084
Plaintiff: George Steven Legrand, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Maxi Drug, Inc. doing business as Brooks Pharmacy and others
Counter Defendant: Meijer Inc and Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
In Re: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
Defendant: Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Perrigo Company, Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Respondent: King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., Prescription Supply, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: Paddock Laboratories Inc
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?