Cases 11 - 20 of 73
In re: Nexon America et al
as 2:2022mc00690
In Re:
Nexon America and Nexon Korea
Respondent:
GoDaddy.com
In Re DMCA 512 (h) Subpoena to Godaddy.com, LLC
as 2:2022mc00204
Petitioner:
Jaspreet Jas Mathur
In Re:
DMCA 512 (h) Subpoena to Godaddy.com, LLC
Respondent:
Godaddy.com, LLC
Hao v. GoDaddy.com LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01709
Plaintiff:
Yuming Hao
Defendant:
GoDaddy.com LLC and Go Daddy Operating Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
hiQ Labs Incorporated v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 2:2022mc00025
In Re:
GoDaddy.com LLC
Plaintiff:
hiQ Labs Incorporated
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Application of Kersia SAS and Hypred SAS
as 2:2022mc00024
In Re:
Application of Kersia SAS and Hypred SAS
Petitioner:
Kersia SAS and Hypred SAS
Respondent:
GoDaddy.com LLC
Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians v. www.pokagon-secrets.com et al
as 1:2022cv00036
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies), www.pokagon-secrets.com, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Gonzalez v. GoDaddy.com, LLC
as 1:2022mc20083
Petitioner:
Eduardo Gonzalez
Respondent:
GoDaddy.com, LLC
Scott Rigsby, et al v. GoDaddy Inc., et al
as 21-16182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT RIGSBY and SCOTT RIGSBY FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
GODADDY INC., GODADDY.COM, LLC, GODADDY OPERATING COMPANY LLC and others
Cisco Systems, Inc. et al v. In Re: DMCA Section 512(h) Subpoena to GoDaddy.com, LLC
as 3:2021mc80168
Plaintiff:
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
In Re: DMCA Section 512(h) Subpoena to GoDaddy.com, LLC
Vetrica Navigation Co. v. Shebah Exploration & Production Company Ltd. et al
as 1:2021mc00255
Garnishee:
Network Solutions, LLC and GoDaddy.com, LLC
Defendant:
Salvic Petroleum Resources Ltd. and Shebah Exploration & Production Company Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Vetrica Navigation Co.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
