Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Underwood v. 1450 SE Orient, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01366
Defendant:
Denise K. Concannon, Michael R. Munzing, Aligra Marie Rainy and others
Plaintiff:
Laura L. Underwood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Justin James Merriman v. Ronald Davis
as 2:2018cv00570
Respondent:
Ronald Davis
Petitioner:
Justin James Merriman
Cunningham v. Seven90, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02500
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Seven90, LLC, Joshua Askeroth, Eli Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-16895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Indiezone, Inc., et al v. Todd Rooke, et al
as 14-16895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INDIEZONE, INC. and EOBUY, LIMITED
Appellant:
CONOR FENNELLY, CEO and DOUGLAS RICHARD DOLLINGER, Counsel
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD ROOKE, JOE ROGNESS, PHIL HAZEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01778
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Indiezone, Inc., et al v. Todd Rooke, et al
as 14-16359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDIEZONE, INC. and EOBUY, LIMITED
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD ROOKE, JOE ROGNESS, PHIL HAZEL and others
United States v. Ocegueda
as 14-4056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUSTIN JAMES OCEGUEDA
Indiezone, Inc. et al v. Rooke et al
as 3:2013cv04280
Plaintiff:
Indiezone, Inc. and eoBuy, Limited
Defendant:
Todd Rooke, Joe Rogness, Phil Hazel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States v. Justin James Rodriguez
as 12-3072
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Justin James Rodriguez, also known as Justin James Lee Rodriguez, also known as Justin James Hunter
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
